A coalition of civil society organisations has expressed strong approval of the ruling from the National Industrial Court in Abuja, which has issued an interim order halting the planned strike by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) against the Dangote Refinery.
The group, which operates under the banner of the Coalition for the Defence of Economic Rights (CODER), described the court’s decision as “a victory for the rule of law and economic stability.” In a statement released after an emergency meeting held on Monday night and signed by its president, Comrade Babajide Oresanya, CODER urged all involved parties to respect the court’s decision and allow the legal process to run its course.
“We hail the decision of the court under Justice Emmanuel Sublim to stop the strike and preserve the integrity of our economy,” Oresanya stated. “The attempt to cripple operations at the Dangote Refinery by cutting off crude oil and gas supply would have inflicted incalculable damage on the livelihoods of ordinary Nigerians. The judiciary has once again risen to the occasion by protecting both the rule of law and the national interest.”
The coalition further issued a warning, stating that industrial unions must not act in any manner that could undermine national development or jeopardize the survival of critical infrastructure. “While we recognise and respect the constitutional right of workers to organise and press their demands, such rights must be exercised responsibly and within the bounds of the law. The refinery is not just a private enterprise; it is a strategic national asset with implications for energy security, job creation, and the wider economy. To hold it hostage for union politics is unacceptable,” the statement read.
Oresanya urged PENGASSAN to reconsider its approach and engage in constructive dialogue with the refinery’s management rather than pursuing a path of confrontation. He also commended the federal government for its swift action in meeting with PENGASSAN and key regulatory agencies, including the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited, the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), and the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA). He further urged all stakeholders to strictly abide by the interim order issued by the court.
“The court has spoken. Any attempt to flout this order would amount to contempt and could further escalate the situation. Nigerians are watching, and what the country needs at this moment is stability, not conflict. Respect for the judiciary is non-negotiable,” Oresanya stressed.
The coalition also voiced its concern that the controversy surrounding PENGASSAN’s allegations against the refinery could serve as a distraction from the broader, more critical national goal of achieving energy sufficiency. “Independent investigations and facts on ground have shown that the Dangote Refinery has been a net creator of jobs, both directly and indirectly. Rather than peddling unsubstantiated allegations, the union should channel energy into ensuring that the refinery delivers optimally and contributes to reducing Nigeria’s dependence on imported petroleum products,” the group noted.
CODER concluded its statement by calling on the Nigerian public to remain calm and to place their trust in the ongoing judicial process. “The interim order is only the first step. The substantive matter will be heard on October 13, and we are confident that the court will dispense justice in line with the facts presented. What is most important now is that all parties submit to the authority of the court and allow reason to prevail,” Oresanya added.
The National Industrial Court had earlier on Monday restrained PENGASSAN from proceeding with its planned nationwide strike. This ruling came after Dangote Refinery’s counsel, George Ibrahim, filed an ex-parte application. In his ruling, Justice Sublim determined that the strike had the potential to cause irreparable harm to the national economy and ordered all parties to maintain the status quo until the substantive case is heard.
