Breaking
Crime

Kano Commissioner Backs Out as Surety in Drug Case

Kano State Commissioner for Transport, Ibrahim Ali Namadi, has officially withdrawn as surety for Sulaiman Aminu Danwawu, a defendant currently facing trial in a major drug trafficking case before the…

Kano State Commissioner for Transport, Ibrahim Ali Namadi, has officially withdrawn as surety for Sulaiman Aminu Danwawu, a defendant currently facing trial in a major drug trafficking case before the Federal High Court in Kano.

In a formal letter dated July 25, 2025, and received by the court on the same day, Namadi stated that he no longer wished to continue serving as surety. He cited personal reasons and concerns over the impact on his public image and official integrity. In his words, “I hereby intend to withdraw as a surety of the above-mentioned person who is standing trial before this honourable court,” noting that his decision was anchored on personal conviction and his dignity as a public officer.

Namadi had earlier stood as surety for Danwawu, who was granted bail under stringent conditions that included a ₦3 million bond and an additional ₦5 million deposit with the court. The terms specifically required a serving commissioner in the Kano State Executive Council to act as surety, a role Namadi initially took up.

However, his involvement drew public criticism amid concerns over rising insecurity, particularly drug-related crime and youth violence in the state. The backlash placed growing pressure on the commissioner and the state government. In his withdrawal letter, Namadi stressed the importance of safeguarding his reputation and aligning with lawful conduct. He expressed regret over the controversy and pledged his continued support for justice and government efforts to tackle drug-related challenges in Kano.

The court has not yet ruled on his application to withdraw. Legal experts indicate that the withdrawal will only be formalized if Danwawu is returned to court custody, as required under the terms of the bail bond. Until then, Namadi remains legally recognized as the surety.

This development adds a new dimension to the ongoing case, which has sparked debate over accountability, due process, and the responsibilities of public officials connected to legal proceedings.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *